Articles & Insights
The Two-Minute Rule
March 29, 2026

If you run a senior living community, there is a strong chance your clinical team already uses PointClickCare. In skilled nursing, PCC holds roughly 70% of the market (source). In assisted living, its share sits between 22 and 26% and growing (source). Across all long-term and post-acute care settings, PointClickCare serves more than 27,000 facilities (source).
Most of those communities chose PCC because it is the standard. It is the platform that surveyors expect to see, that clinical staff know how to use, and that agencies and referral partners can interface with. It is the EHR your team was probably trained on.
But here is the question most operators have not asked: if PointClickCare already manages your resident data, your care plans, your MDS submissions, and your clinical documentation, why is your billing system still disconnected from all of it?
More than 77% of senior living executives rank interoperability as a top-three barrier to technology implementation (source). Only 8.31% of long-term care providers have reached Stage 7 on the LeadingAge CAST EHR Adoption Model, the level that represents full interoperability and health information exchange (source). That number has not improved year over year. It actually dropped from its peak of 8.91% in 2019.
The typical interoperability conversation focuses on clinical data: sharing resident records across care settings, connecting with hospitals during transitions, exchanging medication data with pharmacies. Those are real challenges. But there is a different interoperability gap that gets far less attention, and it affects every community's bottom line directly: the disconnect between clinical systems and payment systems.
In most senior living communities, the EHR and the billing process exist in parallel but not in concert. Resident data lives in PointClickCare. Billing happens in a separate system, or in Excel, or on paper.
This is not an interoperability problem in the way the industry usually talks about it. There is no missing standard or regulatory gap preventing the connection. PointClickCare has a Marketplace specifically designed to enable these integrations. The technology exists. The API connections exist. The payment partners exist. The gap is adoption.
When billing integrates with PointClickCare, the workflow changes fundamentally:
This is what the PointClickCare Marketplace was built to enable. It is not theoretical. It is available.
The PCC Marketplace has payment partners. TransactCare is the most established, with strong case studies showing 96% reductions in processing time (source). Inovalon joined the Marketplace in early 2025, already serving more than 3,000 PCC facilities, but with an enterprise focus that leaves mid-market communities underserved.
But there are critical capabilities that vary across Marketplace payment partners, and they matter more than most operators realize.
Multi-guarantor billing. As we explored in the third article in this series, the person paying a senior living bill is usually not the resident. It is a family member. Often, it is multiple family members splitting costs across states and households. When evaluating PCC-integrated payment partners, confirm the ability to:
That means communities who need multi-guarantor billing, which is most communities with private-pay residents, need to evaluate whether their current payment partner actually supports it or whether they are managing it manually and working around their system.
Two additional capabilities to evaluate:
Three converging trends are making these gaps urgent:
EHR adoption varies dramatically by setting:
(EHR adoption drops sharply outside skilled nursing. More than half of assisted living communities still lack a fully integrated electronic health record, let alone a connected payment system.)
But having an EHR is not the same as using it fully. The vast majority of PCC communities operate somewhere in Stage 4 through 6: functional but not integrated. Clinical workflows are digital. Billing workflows often are not. The two sides of the operation exist in separate systems with manual bridges between them.
(Most PCC communities sit at Stage 4-6: functional but not integrated. The gap between clinical digitization and billing digitization is where the opportunity lives.)
The limitation is not technology. It is awareness and adoption. Many communities do not realize what is available on the Marketplace. Others have not prioritized the connection because the billing process, while inefficient, has not yet broken down badly enough to force the conversation.
"Not broken yet" is a poor standard for a process that touches every resident, every family, and every dollar of revenue your community collects.
If your community already runs on PCC, you have already made the primary technology investment. The EHR is in place. The clinical data is digital. The platform supports Marketplace integrations. The question is whether your payment operations are connected to that investment or running alongside it on a separate track.
The solution is not a new EHR. It is not a rip-and-replace. It is a Marketplace integration that connects your payment system to the platform you already use for everything else.
PatientPay is on the PointClickCare Marketplace and delivers these critical capabilities together: multi-guarantor billing, convenience fee pass-through, flexible delivery by guarantor, and direct PCC integration that keeps your clinical and financial systems in sync. The integration exists. Adoption is the only barrier.
In the next article in this series, we will look at why the window to modernize is narrower than most operators realize, and what happens to communities that wait too long as the competitive landscape shifts.
If you want to see how your community's billing operations measure up, PatientPay's Payment Readiness Assessment scores your operations across five key categories, with a specific focus on how well your payment systems connect to your EHR.